Well, who knows if it will happen or not but I must say it would be welcome news to me. Condi may actually be thinking about the VP spot with McCain. This would actually give the ticket a more conservative credential and a few battling points against the second coming of Obama.
I have a huge amount of respect for Condi and I hope that McCain and Condi get together and consider how much stronger the ticket will be if they can work together.
Here's hoping.
Dan Senor: Condoleezza Rice Is Pursuing the VP Spot
Showing posts with label President. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President. Show all posts
Monday, April 07, 2008
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Democrats have problems voting in Ohio
Well here we go again... voting irregularities in Ohio and amazingly Bush wasn't on the ticket. The Democrats have a word for not seeing the desired outcome of voting... Voting Irregularities.
Clinton, Obama camps see voting problems
I think this is becoming just a bit like the boy who cried wolf. If everytime a Democrat doesn't see the desired result they call it an irregularity and then file suit I think that it might start to become just a little suspicious.
But what can you expect from the party who introduced the super-delegate process. We think that the aristocracy should have more a say than the people.
Clinton, Obama camps see voting problems
I think this is becoming just a bit like the boy who cried wolf. If everytime a Democrat doesn't see the desired result they call it an irregularity and then file suit I think that it might start to become just a little suspicious.
But what can you expect from the party who introduced the super-delegate process. We think that the aristocracy should have more a say than the people.
Labels:
Democrats,
Irregularities,
Ohio,
President,
Primary
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Yet another book!
I am going to say that Bush is not my favorite President but I also do not believe that he is the worst. Now that said, on with my thought.
It amazes me how many "former" aides to the President have seized on the current hate Bush market to make some money. Everyone that has ever worked in the Bush White House is either on a speaking circuit or selling a book about how they knew better.
Now, the former Press Secretary is writing a book in which he blames push for the Scooter Libby issue.
Former Aide Blames Bush for Leak Deceit
I am not sure if any of this information that all of the former aides is releasing is true or not. I would really question motives when each one of them is set to make a pretty decent amount of money for selling the books or giving the speeches.
Also, what ever happened to the stateman's honor and dignity where former aides and politicians showed each other respect? It has become a complete free for all. Unfortunately, I don't see it getting better any time soon.
It amazes me how many "former" aides to the President have seized on the current hate Bush market to make some money. Everyone that has ever worked in the Bush White House is either on a speaking circuit or selling a book about how they knew better.
Now, the former Press Secretary is writing a book in which he blames push for the Scooter Libby issue.
Former Aide Blames Bush for Leak Deceit
I am not sure if any of this information that all of the former aides is releasing is true or not. I would really question motives when each one of them is set to make a pretty decent amount of money for selling the books or giving the speeches.
Also, what ever happened to the stateman's honor and dignity where former aides and politicians showed each other respect? It has become a complete free for all. Unfortunately, I don't see it getting better any time soon.
Monday, November 19, 2007
So many experts
Why is it that every one who leaves the White House immediately has to go on a speaking circuit and disagree with the current policies?
I was just reading Colin Powell's statements about not attacking Iran. He said that Iran is a long way from a nuclear weapon and that the U.S. doesn't have the support to attack Iran.
Powell: Iran far from nuclear weapon
While I respect Mr. Powell's opinion, doesn't it seem convienent that after a few years of being out of office now he has the answers? The media believed he didn't know anything when the Iraq conflict came up. Now after he hasn't had access to current intelligence, we are going to publish how much he knows.
Or could it be that he is being published because he has an opposing view? Or could it be he has an opposing view because they will publish it? Running for VP?
I think it is definitely open to speculation.
I was just reading Colin Powell's statements about not attacking Iran. He said that Iran is a long way from a nuclear weapon and that the U.S. doesn't have the support to attack Iran.
Powell: Iran far from nuclear weapon
While I respect Mr. Powell's opinion, doesn't it seem convienent that after a few years of being out of office now he has the answers? The media believed he didn't know anything when the Iraq conflict came up. Now after he hasn't had access to current intelligence, we are going to publish how much he knows.
Or could it be that he is being published because he has an opposing view? Or could it be he has an opposing view because they will publish it? Running for VP?
I think it is definitely open to speculation.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Ron Paul
I will start off by saying that I like about 60%-70% of what Ron Paul stands for. The other 30-40% would keep me from voting for him. Ron Paul is definitely more Libertarian than he is a Republican. As I stated in an earlier post about Libertarians, I like many of their concepts in principle. He definitely believes in the Libertarian ideals of small government and very little interference in our lives.
My main point of this article is that I really don't believe that he will win the nomination for the Republican party. That being said, don't the Republicans have to open their eyes a little bit when someone with Ron Paul's values has generated the kind of money he has and the buzz that he has created? Isn't it time for the Republicans to realize that most of their base doesn't want larger government every time they turn around?
As long as the Republicans continue to move to the Left I believe that more and more of the base is going to become disgruntled and question the party. I think that if Guiliani wins the primaries it going to cause some serious issues in the Republican party because for many I think it will be the just another indicator of the parties shift to the Left and the loss of it's values.
I hope that the party starts to realize that Ron Paul is gaining support because of his stances on smaller government and less intrusion not on the other 30%.
My main point of this article is that I really don't believe that he will win the nomination for the Republican party. That being said, don't the Republicans have to open their eyes a little bit when someone with Ron Paul's values has generated the kind of money he has and the buzz that he has created? Isn't it time for the Republicans to realize that most of their base doesn't want larger government every time they turn around?
As long as the Republicans continue to move to the Left I believe that more and more of the base is going to become disgruntled and question the party. I think that if Guiliani wins the primaries it going to cause some serious issues in the Republican party because for many I think it will be the just another indicator of the parties shift to the Left and the loss of it's values.
I hope that the party starts to realize that Ron Paul is gaining support because of his stances on smaller government and less intrusion not on the other 30%.
Labels:
Campaign,
Libertarian,
President,
Republicans,
Ron Paul
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
The Making of Queen Hillary
Madame President...
That is exactly what many people want to hear and what many campaign advisors in Hillary's campaign are trying to create (or manufacture).
I have read two stories today about Hillary's campaign officials dictating or manipulating how the questions are asked during debates. After the last debate and the beating that she took in the non-Clintonesta press I do understand.
Here is an article about rigging the questions:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/clinton.planted/index.html
Now it seems that Wolf Blitzer is being told to be nice and not gang up on her in Thursday's debate.
Are the Democrats really interested in Democracy? Is there something that Hillary is afraid of?
That is exactly what many people want to hear and what many campaign advisors in Hillary's campaign are trying to create (or manufacture).
I have read two stories today about Hillary's campaign officials dictating or manipulating how the questions are asked during debates. After the last debate and the beating that she took in the non-Clintonesta press I do understand.
Here is an article about rigging the questions:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/clinton.planted/index.html
Now it seems that Wolf Blitzer is being told to be nice and not gang up on her in Thursday's debate.
Are the Democrats really interested in Democracy? Is there something that Hillary is afraid of?
Friday, October 05, 2007
Your Presidential Candidate?
Want to find out who your Presidential Candidate should be? Try this quiz.
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)